The policies of the Brooklyn Housing Court are an example to the world. Indeed, behind the pervasive corruption in the courts of the state  of New York, there is  brazen extortion. Furthermore, it is difficult for one to imagine an extortion more brazen than in the trial court of Judge Cheryl Gonzales.  Accordingly, this is the point where any investigation of world corruption
should begin. 
     Indeed, at 0930 hours, Monday 27 April 2009, in room 505, Part O, of the Brooklyn Housing
Court (141 Livingston Street, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11201, Telephone Number: 1-347-404-9201), an irrefutably fraudulent petition ( Index Number: 100928/2008) will very outrageously seek the eviction of Respondent Frederick Alexander Jones for his alleged failure to pay his rent. 
     The tenant, Jones, will plainly be a section 8 and rent stabalized person who had always paid his rent on time and in the full amount. The tenant will,again, attempt to submit all the necessary cancelled checks to the Court. His obligation to pay his rent had never been honestly questioned, during the five previous years that he resided in his section 8 apartment. Nevertheless, judges Maria Milin, Peter M. Wendt, and Cheryl J. Gonzales very repeatedly demanded, in the most castigating manner, that Jones obey his landlord. The plainly illegal extra rent that the landlord had demanded directly from Jones will be paid, otherwise immediate eviction is certain (according to these judges). 
     Obviously, Jones had been chosen by his landlord because he was an elderly disabled veteran who had been in very poor health. Indeed, on Monday 16 March 2009, Jones was released from the Manhattan Veterans' Affairs Hospital after a major surgical procedure. He did expect to spend the remainder of life on the street. He expected to loose all of the property for which he had made hideous sacrafices to possess. It would  have been the result of an attempted extortion. But, like most corruption and most organized crime activity, such depraved travesties of justice are never explained nor seen on television. In addition, the ordeal of spending entire days in courtrooms had been another way to extort money and to  punish the tenant. In any case, the constant threat of all of these horrors is still being used by Judge Gonzales. She must know that stress can kill the plainly innocent tenant. 
     The extremely outrageous presumption that the aforesaid brooklyn housing court judges demanded is that Jones does owe the illegal extra rents as a result of  "deemed renewal leases".  This is despite the obvious fact that such leases, in order to be lawful and proper, had to contain the "same terms and conditions" contained in the expiring leases (the Tenancy Addendum, etc.).  Indeed, a direct demand for a rent increase is always illegal in many ways, under Section 8.  
See, 9 NYCRR 2523.5 (c) (2), at http://www.law.cornell.edu/states/ny.html.  
See, also, 9 NYCRR 2523.5 (a) ( An offer to renew the lease must be on the same terms and conditions as the expiring lease), at http://www.law.cornell.edu/states/ny.html.  
See, also, 24 CFR 982.507 (a) (4) : "At all time during the assisted tenancy, the rent to owner may not exceed the reasonable rent as most recently determined or redetermined by the PHA ," at http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr.
See, also, 24 CFR 982.451 (b) (4) (ii) : " The owner may not demand or accept any rent payment from the tenant in excess of this maximum, ...," also, at http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr.  
See, also, ROSARIO  v.  DIAGONAL REALTY, LLC, 840 N.Y.S. 2d 748 (Ct. App. 2007), 751, 8 N.Y.3d 755, 761, 872 N.E. 2d 860 : "Landlords who accept Section 8 payments are required to include, in the leases that they sign with Section 8 beneficiaries, a "tenancy addendum" prescribed by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (See, 24 CFR 982.305 [a] [3]; 982.308 [b] [2] ....)", at http://www.law.cornell.edu/nyctap/I07_0111.htm.
     Indeed, Frederick Alexander Jones is an H.P.D. Section 8 and Rent Stabilized tenant. Accordingly, he is a New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development Section 8 Tenant-Based Assistance Housing Choice Voucher Program tenant (voucher number : 102241, Case Manager Ali Stokes : 1-212-863-6508). Nevertheless, in any case all demands for rent increases had to be directed to the aforesaid H.P.D.. See, the HPD Commissioner Rafael E. Cestero's annual promulgation of the proper procedure for requesting regulated rent increases ( the "Annual Adjustments to Rent - Rent Increases"), Chapter 9, at page 66 : http://www.nyc.gov/html/hpd/downloads/pdf/2008-section-8-Administrative-Plan.pdf. , or http://www.nyc.gov >search NYC.gov for : "hpd administrative plan" >select : "administrative plan effective july 14, 2008"
           One may, also, focus on a government deparment that intentially destroys tenants by  furtively informing all potential employers, doctors, landlords, postal carriers, family, and friends, etc., of mountains of the most malicious slander. This is law enforcement that literally manufactures criminal conduct indirectly. For Jones, therefore,  there will always be punishment-medicine, punishment-housing, etc.. 
     I am speaking of parole supervision, it alleges to be good surveillance and good social service.  However, they work closely with criminals who know where the parole officers live, who know their families, who know  where they do all of their dirt, and who are easily influenced by omnipresent members of  organized crime.  Secrecy hides the fact that there has never been a serious study that found a positive result for parole supervision.  It is incredibly costly, and their is clearly no positive return for enormous amounts of money. See, an extremely respected study that plainly had the best methodology : http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?id=311156 .